WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. (1948) Facts: Two tracts of land owned by two different parties shared a reservoir. One of the attached wells blew out when Texon was drilling and caught fire and cratered, so quantities dissipated. o Elliff: I own the land and thus what’s beneath and heavens above (correlative rights). WebMabel and Frank Elliff (Petitioners) own a parcel of land upon a producing well. They had a royalty interest in oil and gas leases on their land. Clara Driscoll owned the land …

ELLIFF v. TEXON DRILLING. CO 146 Tex. 575 - Casemine

WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co., 146-150 Notes and Questions, 150 Problems, 150-151 Willcox v. Stroup, 151-155 Relativity of Title (12 pages) Text, 155 ... Ark Land Co. v. Harper, 691–695 Notes and Questions, 695–697 September 30th Present Estates and Future Interests (8 pages) Text, 747–755 patogenia da raiva canina

Law of Capture Legal Meaning & Law Definition: Free Law

WebTexon Drilling Co. (Tex. 1948), Hague v. Wheeler (1893), United States Steel Corp. v. Hoge (1983) and more. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Elliff v. WebElliff v. Texon Drilling (Tex. 1948) Physical Waste After Texon well blew out, Eilliff's neighboring gas and oil escaped underground. HELD. The negligent waste and … WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co., 1948, 146 Tex. 575, 210 S.W.2d 558, 4 A.L.R.2d 191. That opinion says that the gas is subject to regulation and to legitimate drainage under the law of capture, but that the owner 'is accorded the usual remedies against trespassers who appropriate the minerals or destroy their market value.' Moreover, the same ... patogenia de el asma