WebThe day the suit was filed, legal scholar Noah Feldman called Texas v. Pennsylvania part of a coup attempt by Trump and his allies rather than a serious legal case. “The Texas … Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2024), was a lawsuit filed at the United States Supreme Court contesting the administration of the 2024 presidential election in certain states, in which Joe Biden defeated incumbent Donald Trump. Filed by Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton on December 8, 2024, under … See more Several states changed their voting laws prior to the 2024 United States presidential election to make postal voting easier, due to fears that in-person voting would expose people to COVID-19. Numerous legal challenges to voting … See more Law The suit was criticized by legal experts and called "outlandish". University of Texas School of Law law professor Stephen I. Vladeck called the suit the "craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election". Election law expert See more • United States portal • Politics portal • Law portal • See more Procedure The case was filed on December 8, 2024, directly with the Supreme Court as it holds original jurisdiction over disputes between states. Such cases are infrequent: there were 123 "original jurisdiction" cases from 1789 to 1959. … See more On December 11, in an unsigned ruling, the court ruled that Texas lacked standing and denied the suit. The State of Texas's motion for leave to file a bill of … See more After the Court declined to hear the case, Allen West, chairman of the Republican Party of Texas, suggested that "law-abiding states … See more • Motion filed by AG Paxton • Motion to expedite • Amicus brief filed by seventeen states • Amicus brief filed by 126 Republican members of the House of Representatives See more
Deputy for Texas Attorney General Paxton defeats ethics case …
WebYes and yes. Justice Joseph Story delivered the opinion of the Court. The 1788 and 1826 Pennsylvania laws contradicted Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution and the Fugitive … Web8 Dec 2024 · Edward Prigg & Margaret Morgan. Edward Prigg was a slave catcher. His job was to find and capture slaves, and return them to their owners. In the 1830s, he was hired to find and return Margaret ... making fiends internet archive
Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398 (1939) - supreme.justia.com
Web21 Dec 2024 · Texas v. Pennsylvania Would Have Upended the Electoral College Derek Muller Texas’s innovative injury would allow any state to sue any other state, directly in the Supreme Court, for breach of its election … WebJustia › US Law › Case Law › Pennsylvania Case Law › Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania Decisions › 1988 › Ott v. Buehler Saw Co. Ott v. Buehler Lumber Co. Annotate this Case. 373 Pac. Superior Ct. 515 (1988) 541 A.2d 1143. Arcadian OTT, Appellee, v. BUEHLER LUMBER CORPORATE, Petitioner. Supreme Court of Central. Argued November 5, 1987 ... Web28 Feb 2024 · Characterizing this “windfall” as unfair, Pennsylvania filed an action that asked us to reconsider Texas ’s escheatment rules. 407 U. S., at 213–215. Pennsylvania argued that the proceeds from an abandoned money order should escheat to the State where the money order was purchased rather than the State of the creditor’s last known … making fiends icon